His
Paintings are worth $10.28
per
square inch
____________________________
ART
AS AN INVESTMENT
____________________________
Antoine
Gaber can chart performance of his work vs. index
_______________________
By
Scott Adams
There
aren't many artists who can hand you a chart showing how
their paintings have performed against the Standard &
Poor' 500 stock index. Antoine Gaber of Toronto can. When
he sold his first impressionistic works in 1997, they fetched
$1.62 per square inch. His latest ones have been worth $10.28
per square inch. That means his paintings' value has increased
at an annual compound rate of 38%. Not bad considering the
S&P 500 has returned on average 7% per year over that
time.
While art has its aesthetic pleasures, for many people it's
an investment, too. So when an artist like Mr. Gaber presents
such attractive returns, the natural question for potential
investors is: What performs better in the long term, art
or stocks?
One
problem in answering this question is that few artists are
as entrepreneurial as Mr. Gaber. A former scientist and
businessman, he left the pharmaceutical industry to devote
himself full time to painting. Now, he runs his art studio
like he would any other business venture, with a business
plan and a Web site to market his work internationally.
And he has carefully tracked the value of his work over
the years.
"Being
a businessman, you're always trying to measure performance,"
he says.
He
recently represented Canada at the Biennale Internazionale
dell'Arte Contemporanea, an international art show
in Florence, Italy, and took his chart along to
show how the value of his art has increased.
"I
was told I am the first artist [they've seen] do
that," says Mr. Gaber.
|

Antoine
Gaber's Afternoon Sailing is an oil painting on
canvas painted in 2001.
|
Despite
his efforts, the value of Mr. Gaber's individual
paintings remains hard to pin down because there
is no resale market in his work.
Even
Mr. Gaber can't tell you how much a painting of
his that you'd bought in 1997 would be worth today
until someone sells an early work on the open market.
While the chart tracking what he has earned selling
his art over the years suggests his work has appreciated,
It doesn't confirm its value.
|
|
There
are, however, databases that track art's investment performance
by recording auction prices going back decades. For example,
Jiangping Mei and Michael Moses, professors at the Stem
School of Business at New York University, have indexed
6,000 works of art that have sold at least twice since 1885
and found that art and stocks have delivered about the same
performance over the years. The two asset classes jockey
back and forth depending on the period in question.
For
instance, the annual compound return of the Mei / Moses
Annual All Art Index (www.meimosesfineartindex.org) from
1960 to spring 2003 was 11.1%, based on more than 4,000
repeat sales. The S&P 500 returned 10.7% over the same
time.
The
big difference between art and stocks is that art is more
volatile. The standard deviation (a statistical measure
of the average distance from the mean) over this time for
art was 18.7%, while for stocks it was 11.9%. This is not
surprising since there are fewer transactions in art; thus,
the sale of a single artwork has a big impact on the total
index.
Also
interesting is the correlation between art and stocks. This
measure shows whether two investments tend to move in tandem.
For art and stocks, the correlation is very low, at 0.098.
This means that for investors wishing to diversify their
portfolios beyond stocks, buying art is a smart move. There
is a still lower correlation between art and bonds, meaning
that bondholders get an even greater diversification benefit
from investing in art.
In
their studies, Mssrs. Mei and Moses have also found evidence
that expensive masterpieces under perform against lower-priced
works over the years.
"What
is exciting to me about that is that it implies you don't
have to be super wealthy to get some investment potential
in art," Mr. Moses says. "[The art market] is
democratic, just like the stock market."
Financial
Post